1. Media PR Approach for Corporate Online Crises: This method targets illegal negative acts arising from malicious competition, such as online slander, false accusations, portrait right infringement, and secret photography. Without a court judgment, we collect evidence and other materials with technical support to strengthen our negotiation position and conduct business negotiations, so as to achieve the desired results for our clients.

Advantages: Flexible and thorough.

Disadvantages: Passive and relatively costly.

2. Legal Approach for Corporate Online Crisis Management: This method addresses negative information from illegal acts caused by malicious competition, including online slander, false accusations, portrait right infringement, and secret photography. We urge judicial authorities and fully cooperate with law enforcement agencies through technical means to conduct effective online evidence collection and obtain legitimate compensation.

Advantages: Easy to gain public credibility, helpful for securing industry status, suitable for large enterprises and well-known websites, and beneficial to our party.

Disadvantages: Complex process, large investment, and difficulties in judicial enforcement of results.

3. Optimized Positive Promotion Approach for Corporate Online Crises: In response to illegal information acts such as online slander, false accusations, portrait right infringement, and secret photography resulting from malicious competition, and without a court judgment, this approach expands media promotion of the client’s website, improves user experience with our technical support, and helps the website outrank competitors in search results. Based on netizens’ online usage habits, it effectively expands positive publicity and reduces the exposure of negative information online, achieving the client’s objectives.

Advantages: Flexible, simple and convenient to implement.

Disadvantages: Cannot completely eliminate negative exposure.

4. Technical Approach for Corporate Online Crises: This method targets illegal negative acts from malicious competition, such as online slander, false accusations, portrait right infringement, and secret photography. Without a court judgment, it carries out technical enforcement against the offending websites and servers to achieve the client’s goals. (Applicable only to individuals or small and medium-sized websites, mainly targeting overseas illegal websites.)

Advantages: Flexible, efficient in removing obstacles, and relieves grievances.

Disadvantages: Highly confrontational and involves legal boundaries.

---